| |||||||||||||
syslog vs other solutionssyslog vs other solutionsPosted Nov 15, 2012 19:32 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)In reply to: syslog vs other solutions by Wol Parent article: LCE: Systemd two years on
The systemd/udev maintainers have recently announced that compiling udev without systemd is no longer supported
(Log in to post comments)
syslog vs other solutions Posted Nov 15, 2012 23:52 UTC (Thu) by BlueLightning (subscriber, #38978) [Link]
Really? Can you point to this announcement? It was only in April that Lennart had this to say on the matter:
syslog vs other solutions Posted Nov 17, 2012 17:14 UTC (Sat) by engla (guest, #47454) [Link]
I think you need to build both udev and systemd, but you can install just the udev products.
syslog vs other solutions Posted Nov 17, 2012 18:47 UTC (Sat) by jrn (subscriber, #64214) [Link]
> The systemd/udev maintainers have recently announced that compiling udev without systemd is no longer supported
That is frightening. Regardless of what you think of systemd, the udev maintainers have just said loudly and clearly "We don't care about you" to a substantial existing population of users.
syslog vs other solutions Posted Nov 17, 2012 19:38 UTC (Sat) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
I've checked the recent posts in udev's mail list and I can't find what dlang is talking about.
syslog vs other solutions Posted Nov 17, 2012 23:18 UTC (Sat) by jimparis (subscriber, #38647) [Link]
From http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.hotplug.devel/17444 (May 2012)
"We support stand-alone *operation* of the udev tools, but the build
syslog vs other solutions Posted Nov 18, 2012 0:13 UTC (Sun) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
it's not recent news.
The recent news is that some Gentoo developers have (sortof) announced that they are planning to fork udev as a result of how it's being managed since being merged into systemd
|
|||||||||||||