LWN.net Logo

The monoculture of meritocracy

The monoculture of meritocracy

Posted Nov 15, 2012 16:59 UTC (Thu) by pboddie (subscriber, #50784)
In reply to: The monoculture of meritocracy by ortalo
Parent article: Crowding out OpenBSD

The issue of which platform to use is mostly concerned with what most of the potential contributors are likely to know and which platform is covered best by most of the available documentation and shared knowledge, so if it's easier to find people who know how to write a Linux driver for some hardware, then a project will choose Linux first and foremost. That hasn't stopped other operating systems being ported to such devices, though:

http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Category:Distributions

And it's perfectly possible that other platforms can take advantage of the work done by Linux developers to get driver support for hardware even if they refuse to port the actual drivers. I'm aware of at least one "from scratch" operating system project for the Ben NanoNote that has presumably been able to take advantage of the fully documented hardware and Free Software drivers already written for Linux, so it's not as if the Linux community is denying others opportunities. In fact, it's very much the opposite of that.


(Log in to post comments)

The monoculture of meritocracy

Posted Nov 16, 2012 8:35 UTC (Fri) by ortalo (subscriber, #4654) [Link]

I totally agree with the importance of knowledge you outline.

However, I also think alternative OS do not take so much advantage of Linux work (or cooperation) as they suffer from the fact of being considered second class or second hand implementation (and not the full solution, i.e. "maybe better than Linux").

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds