| |||||||||||||
Crowding out OpenBSDCrowding out OpenBSDPosted Nov 15, 2012 2:53 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Crowding out OpenBSD by Lennie Parent article: Crowding out OpenBSD
The creator of systemd specifically made the choice created an architecture leveraging the best parts of the Linux kernel.cgroups? Best parts? Only from the perspective that it provides a feature that you can't get any other way. Not from the perspective that it's a crawling horror, nor, indeed that it's considered any good by any of the kernel developers. :)
(Log in to post comments)
Crowding out OpenBSD Posted Nov 16, 2012 21:34 UTC (Fri) by Tet (subscriber, #5433) [Link] Not from the perspective that it's a crawling horror, nor, indeed that it's considered any good by any of the kernel developers. :)I've heard that claim many times. But I'm too far removed from what's going on in kernel space these days. So if they're as bad as people are claiming, what alternatives does the kernel provide that give the same functionality as cgroups?
Crowding out OpenBSD Posted Nov 18, 2012 15:39 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
None. That's why they get used, even if they *are* a crawling horror internally.
|
|||||||||||||