| |||||||||||||
No thanks.No thanks.Posted Nov 10, 2012 23:08 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: No thanks. by Cyberax Parent article: Haley: We're doing an ARM64 OpenJDK port!
I actually solved this once with a really ugly exception-unwinder (implemented mostly in macros with one fugly bit of arch-dependent code). A few years later I had to port it to a new platform and wished I'd done something else.
(btw, I wish you'd be less bloody combative all the time. You turn every discussion on LWN into a minor war.)
(Log in to post comments)
No thanks. Posted Nov 11, 2012 0:45 UTC (Sun) by hummassa (subscriber, #307) [Link]
Kettle, meet pot. :-D
But j/k, I love your discussions. From both of you. I learn a lot.
No thanks. Posted Nov 11, 2012 5:12 UTC (Sun) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
>I actually solved this once with a really ugly exception-unwinder (implemented mostly in macros with one fugly bit of arch-dependent code).
Yup. Each sufficiently complex error handling system is indistinguishable from exceptions.
> (btw, I wish you'd be less bloody combative all the time. You turn every discussion on LWN into a minor war.)
|
|||||||||||||