| |||||||||||||
Why not just "cheat" and devote a whole core to the RT process?Why not just "cheat" and devote a whole core to the RT process?Posted Oct 31, 2012 19:32 UTC (Wed) by XTF (guest, #83255)In reply to: Why not just "cheat" and devote a whole core to the RT process? by Richard_J_Neill Parent article: Software interrupts and realtime
> On a multicore box, wouldn't it be easier just to dedicate a whole CPU core, 100% of the time to a particular process?
Doesn't this (kinda) happen automatically, if priorities are set right?
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||