| |||||||||||||
Why not just "cheat" and devote a whole core to the RT process?Why not just "cheat" and devote a whole core to the RT process?Posted Oct 29, 2012 18:20 UTC (Mon) by cbf123 (guest, #74020)In reply to: Why not just "cheat" and devote a whole core to the RT process? by dlang Parent article: Software interrupts and realtime
Intel's networking fastpath basically just throws power consumption out the window and dedicates entire cpu cores to spinning on the network devices.
100% cpu usage, constantly, but you get really low-latency networking!
A somewhat less intrusive method is to direct only the interrupts you care about to the "isolated" cpu while leaving all the rest to be handled as normal.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||