| |||||||||||||
What peculiar semanticsWhat peculiar semanticsPosted Oct 28, 2012 20:31 UTC (Sun) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)In reply to: What peculiar semantics by wookey Parent article: Airlie: raspberry pi drivers are NOT useful
> Just to be clear that should be qualified as: "Any other recent ARM system with a GPU"
Yes, this is a good point. The problem is with the GPU vendors. In the ARM space, they are where NVIDIA and ATI were about 8 years ago, but in this case, it's all vendors, including Intel.
(Log in to post comments)
What peculiar semantics Posted Oct 29, 2012 9:13 UTC (Mon) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link] What Intel chips are your talking about? Intel stopped producing ARM chips more then five years ago...
What peculiar semantics Posted Oct 29, 2012 18:04 UTC (Mon) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link]
Intel's mobile chipsets are just like everyone else's (except broadcom now), closed binary blobs running either in the kernel or in userspace.
What peculiar semantics Posted Oct 30, 2012 0:27 UTC (Tue) by cyanit (guest, #86671) [Link]
It seems that Intel might eventually replace Atom with scaled down versions of their laptop CPUs, and those come with documented GPUs with open source drivers.
|
|||||||||||||