LWN.net Logo

An update on the ext4 corruption issue

An update on the ext4 corruption issue

Posted Oct 28, 2012 13:04 UTC (Sun) by th0ma7 (guest, #24698)
Parent article: An update on the ext4 corruption issue

Glad to have stick with XFS after all... ;)


(Log in to post comments)

An update on the ext4 corruption issue

Posted Oct 28, 2012 16:42 UTC (Sun) by engla (guest, #47454) [Link]

I don't think you read the item.

An update on the ext4 corruption issue

Posted Oct 30, 2012 7:46 UTC (Tue) by kleptog (subscriber, #1183) [Link]

XFS isn't everything. The checker for XFS requires something like 1GB of RAM for each 1TB of disk space. This doesn't sound bad until you want to install a machine with 96TB of disk and 64GB of RAM. You then find out that the ext4 user space tools can't init a disk that big and XFS can't check a disk that big. :(

Using xfs_repair -n is a workaround, but still (IMHO) a hack.

An update on the ext4 corruption issue

Posted Oct 30, 2012 10:35 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Or you could use an old Unix trick of the trade: use four or five smaller filesystems rather than one huge one and not put yourself completely in the crapper should one of them get corrupted. (I'd have been in much worse trouble if I hadn't split the frequently-written-to /var off from the rest, for instance.)

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds