| |||||||||||||
No thanks to trolls.No thanks to trolls.Posted Oct 26, 2012 16:36 UTC (Fri) by cortana (subscriber, #24596)In reply to: No thanks to trolls. by alankila Parent article: Haley: We're doing an ARM64 OpenJDK port!
These days Mono is used in preference's to Microsoft's own .NET implementation by some developers who are targeting Windows (e.g., Bastion).
(Log in to post comments)
No thanks to trolls. Posted Oct 26, 2012 17:20 UTC (Fri) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link] Bastion uses Mono because it was not developed for Windows. Chrome (NaCl) and Mac ports were planned relatively early thus it made sense to use Mono. If you use recent versions of C# then it's basically impossible to use Mono.
No thanks to trolls. Posted Nov 9, 2012 3:14 UTC (Fri) by HelloWorld (guest, #56129) [Link]
> If you use recent versions of C# then it's basically impossible to use Mono.
Yeah right, except that Mono fully implements the current C# 5.0 specification.
No thanks to trolls. Posted Nov 9, 2012 4:35 UTC (Fri) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link]
Yeah, and Microsoft is known for strictly adhering to specifications.
No thanks to trolls. Posted Nov 9, 2012 15:50 UTC (Fri) by HelloWorld (guest, #56129) [Link]
Name a place where Microsofts C# compiler deviates from the spec.
No thanks to trolls. Posted Nov 9, 2012 18:08 UTC (Fri) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link]
If a standards-compliant compiler were all that mattered, Mono might have a chance.
All this has been beaten to death elsewhere so I'll leave it here.
|
|||||||||||||