| |||||||||||||
Wayland and Weston 1.0 releasedWayland and Weston 1.0 releasedPosted Oct 26, 2012 12:33 UTC (Fri) by renox (subscriber, #23785)In reply to: Wayland and Weston 1.0 released by daniels Parent article: Wayland and Weston 1.0 released
>It's not smooth.[cut]
*Sigh*, at the beginning of the discussion I said 'with server side decoration the window will resize smoothly but the content of the window will be "ugly"' so I know..
>objectively speaking, the scaled content looks worse than genuine client-rendered content
And "objectively speaking" having the frame of the window resize smoothly all the time is better than resizing jerkily when the application is slow to answer to events.
I don't read the text of my windows while I'm resizing them, that why I care more about smooth resizing of the windows frame than having a nice content inside, that is a *trade-off* you prefer one option I prefer the other, that's all.
>And hey, if it forces app authors to actually think about making their clients more responsive to user interaction, that's no bad thing at all.
I actually agree with that, but as I've already said it's not easy at all, especially if you use a GC!
(Log in to post comments)
Wayland and Weston 1.0 released Posted Oct 26, 2012 16:05 UTC (Fri) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198) [Link]
> So it's either that, or you can leave the window contents in place at the last size the client gave you, and track the new size with an outline. Which is 100% possible to implement within Wayland.
This also seems to cover the use case you are looking for, similar to how some older WMs worked.
Wayland and Weston 1.0 released Posted Oct 26, 2012 16:30 UTC (Fri) by renox (subscriber, #23785) [Link]
>> So it's either that, or you can leave the window contents in place at the last size the client gave you, and track the new size with an outline. Which is 100% possible to implement within Wayland.
> This also seems to cover the use case you are looking for, similar to how some older WMs worked.
Not really, you loose information about how your window will look when resized which is annoying, but I think that this configuration is the best when you're using remote applications on high latency communications, so it's still an interesting configuration.
Wayland and Weston 1.0 released Posted Oct 26, 2012 16:32 UTC (Fri) by daniels (subscriber, #16193) [Link]
> Not really, you loose information about how your window will look when resized
Which you also lose whilst scaling.
Wayland and Weston 1.0 released Posted Oct 26, 2012 18:02 UTC (Fri) by renox (subscriber, #23785) [Link]
>> Not really, you loose information about how your window will look when resized
>Which you also lose whilst scaling.
Which are very temporary, short situations.
Wayland and Weston 1.0 released Posted Oct 26, 2012 18:37 UTC (Fri) by daniels (subscriber, #16193) [Link]
> Which are very temporary, short situations.
Equally as temporary and short as for client-side decorations. Although I still maintain CSDs are likely to be even more responsive for the reasons I listed above.
|
|||||||||||||