| |||||||||||||
Wayland and Weston 1.0 releasedWayland and Weston 1.0 releasedPosted Oct 24, 2012 17:03 UTC (Wed) by wmf (guest, #33791)In reply to: Wayland and Weston 1.0 released by mjg59 Parent article: Wayland and Weston 1.0 released
Writing a pedantically-correct FAQ that encourages misunderstandings is a good way to FUD your own project. It should say something like "Remoting is out of scope for the Wayland protocol or Weston compositor, but this will be solved with a proxy that will be bundled with your distro and will Just Workâ˘".
(Log in to post comments)
Wayland and Weston 1.0 released Posted Oct 24, 2012 17:07 UTC (Wed) by wmf (guest, #33791) [Link]
I hate to respond to myself, but I looked at the actual Wayland FAQ and it's not as bad as the quote above implies, but it's still pretty confusing.
FAQ could be more helpful Posted Oct 25, 2012 4:28 UTC (Thu) by amtota (guest, #4012) [Link]
I agree, although I am biased as I maintain xpra.org, I would have expected the Wayland devs to get in touch with us or at least provide a link for those who do want to keep network transparency. Oh well.
|
|||||||||||||