| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Scoring apt-usage on RH and on SuSEScoring apt-usage on RH and on SuSEPosted Oct 2, 2003 17:43 UTC (Thu) by jasonlotito (guest, #15665)In reply to: Scoring apt-usage on RH and on SuSE by ladislav Parent article: The Great Package Management Experiment I'm just trying to figure out why you only reviewed YOU, and avoided YaST. Indeed, you went ahead an installed apt-get for some reason when YaST works fine. In fact, YaST is perfectly capable of handling non SuSE distributed RPM's, such as those from usr-local-bin. Upgrading is just as easy too. It's just a matter of getting the new CD, putting it in, and upgrading. Your mark of 6 against SuSE is really just unfair. Great, so SuSE's unofficial apt-get package manager is a 6. But what about YaST, the default, and much better package manager? Putting this into perspective, Debian would receive a low score because when I tried to install YaST, Debian gave me problems.
(Log in to post comments)
Scoring apt-usage on RH and on SuSE Posted Nov 29, 2003 2:27 UTC (Sat) by agill (guest, #17301) [Link] "In fact, YaST is perfectly capable of handling non SuSE distributed RPM's, such as those from usr-local-bin."I was talking to a SuSE employee on IRC and I was told that YaST can't use 3rd party software repositories and that I should try to stick to SuSE provided RPMs or use something like apt for suse. I like to create my own RPMs for certain software and store them on my local ftp server. Could you please provide some links to documents describing how to coerce YaST into displaying my custom software from my local server? "Upgrading is just as easy too. It's just a matter of getting the new CD, putting it in, and upgrading." Hmm but what if I want to update a remote server? I don't have anything against SuSE but that's one thing I really like about Debian. Two commands have allowed me to upgrade remote computers from one version of the OS to another.
|
|
||||||||||||