Re: Discarding uploaded binary packages
[Posted October 17, 2012 by ris]
| From: |
| Stefano Zacchiroli <zack-AT-debian.org> |
| To: |
| debian-devel-AT-lists.debian.org |
| Subject: |
| Re: Discarding uploaded binary packages |
| Date: |
| Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:01:56 +0200 |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:59:27PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I know this subject has been discussed on and off in the past, but
> there's new evidence that it's simply the right thing to do.
Nice, although it's not new evidence we need :). The state of last
discussion on the matter is that there is consensus in going ahead, here
are a couple of pointers:
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg00840.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/06/ms...
> So, are we ready to do this?
Sure, where are your dak patches implementing it? :)
Note: I don't want to smash down the discussion with a lame "show me the
code" argument. But I do want to avoid the impression that "we're unable
to decide" when I fact, in this case, we are and we did. But that's,
unfortunately, not enough to make appear out of thin area the code
implementing the decision.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o
Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
(
Log in to post comments)