For that matter, how many people actually put useful information in the tags of the pics out of their camera? Maybe, once they put it up on Facebook, do they tag it - but the kind of thing in a photo caption - eg. L to R - Grampa Jimmie Johnson, Grandmaw Kerry Johnson, Grandmaw Shelly Johnson, Uncle Fred, Uncle Thomas - doesn't get added. And then there's the metadata about the metadata... that the Johnsons are a troika marriage...
Ultimately, you spend insane amounts of time putting information about the pics, that you hardly get time to share them with friends.
Posted Oct 16, 2012 9:38 UTC (Tue) by renox (subscriber, #23785)
[Link]
Tags can be automated, you identify one or two picture and then you have a software tagging all your pictures automatically.
Plasma Active Three released
Posted Oct 16, 2012 9:52 UTC (Tue) by aseigo (guest, #18394)
[Link]
There is definitely a limit on how much detail one will put into tagging. Turns out that's fine: even basic organization does wonders, and it's no more difficult (faster, even) than creating folder hierarchies on disk. So in theory it could suck, but we've found that in practice (with Plasma Active) it doesn't.