Re: [PATCH 1/4] module: add syscall to load module from fd

Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Why?  Not only have you had these patches sitting for a while, way
> before you had the kernel module patches, they've been acked/signed off
> by Kees, Serge, Eric, and myself.  All security subtree maintainers.
> The module patches could have easily been built on top of Kees' small
> patches.  I am really disappointed!

Me too.

Linus' merge window opened on Monday 1-10-2012.  One week before that
was Monday 24-09-2012, which is the nominal close of my merge window.

The patches were sent on 21-09 (Friday for you, the weekend my time).

If I had nothing else to do on Monday, I would have applied it, but we
spent the week trying to get the module signing patches into shape :(

If I take them now, they need to go through linux-next.  That won't
happen until Monday.  I want two days in linux-next, so that people who
test linux-next get a chance to find issues, so that's Wednesday before
I send to Linus, which is getting very late into the merge window.

And keep adding two days for every trivial issue which is found :(

It's in my modules-wip branch for 3.8.

Cheers,
Rusty.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html