I just "git pull"ed and (after hundreds of lines of updates) my Makefile remains:
VERSION = 3
PATCHLEVEL = 6
SUBLEVEL = 0
EXTRAVERSION =
NAME = Terrified Chipmunk
So i'm not in some stream which includes/receives "stable" releases, apparently [shrug]
However, given the Wikipedia excerpt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel#Version_numbering):
/---
On 29 May 2011, Linus Torvalds announced that the kernel version would be bumped to 3.0 for the release following 2.6.39, to commemorate the 20th anniversary of Linux. It continued the time-based release practice introduced with 2.6.0, but using the second number...i.e. 3.1 would follow 3.0 after a few months. An additional number (now the third number) would be added on when necessary to designate security and bug fixes, as for example with 3.0.18.
\---
Is there any reason to understand that 3.6.1 is a "stable release" (as opposed to a "security and bug fix")?
Posted Oct 8, 2012 2:37 UTC (Mon) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
[Link]
> Is there any reason to understand that 3.6.1 is a "stable release" (as opposed to a "security and bug fix")?
a 'stable' release is security and bugfix, so it's two ways of saying the same thing
so 3.6 is released, 3.6.x are bugifx updates to 3.6, all new development is headed for 3.7
normally, around the time that 3.7.1 is released, all support will cease for 3.6.x
"Long Term Support" kernels are ones where someone has decided to support them for a longer timeframe. Currently 3.0.x and 3.4.x are in this category. There is no firm timeframe for when support for these will cease.
Lots of stable kernel updates
Posted Oct 8, 2012 6:04 UTC (Mon) by istenrot (subscriber, #69564)
[Link]
You need to track Greg's stable tree in addition to Linus' master tree in order to get stable releases.
You probably have already cloned Linus' tree:
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git