| |||||||||||||
Debian relicenses its logoDebian relicenses its logoPosted Oct 1, 2012 14:42 UTC (Mon) by juliank (subscriber, #45896)Parent article: Debian relicenses its logo
So, the logo without the name (which was free already, licensed under the Expat license) in it is now less liberally licensed than previously? I don't really see the reason for this part of the change.
(Log in to post comments)
Debian relicenses its logo Posted Oct 1, 2012 16:39 UTC (Mon) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106) [Link]
I believe the relevant quite is "We've also been advised not to relicense the "with 'Debian'" logo under a so-called "liberal" license like the Expat license." -- I guess the CC-BY-SA license is considered sufficiently equivalent? I don't see that an MIT-style license is particularly appropriate for artwork, especially since it references "Software" specifically.
|
|||||||||||||