| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
How different from RC5How different from RC5Posted Oct 1, 2003 16:35 UTC (Wed) by rknop (guest, #66)Parent article: OpenOffice.org 1.1 released I downloaded RC5 a few days ago. Is this just RC5 renamed, or did any bugs get fixed? (I'm wondering if it's worth the redownload or not.) -Rob
(Log in to post comments)
How different from RC5 Posted Oct 1, 2003 16:43 UTC (Wed) by alspnost (subscriber, #2763) [Link] Fair question - I couldn't find an actual changelog anywhere. But anyway, I can't imagine that anything changed since RC5, and if you're not encountering any problems, it certainly isn't worth another 60MB download! I'm still running RC2 at home, with no bugs biting me so far....
How different from RC5 Posted Oct 1, 2003 18:37 UTC (Wed) by captrb (subscriber, #2291) [Link] That's irritating. OpenOffice.org doesn't seem to follow traditional release conventions. The Eclipse project seems to have the same issue. I guess I'm not surprised, though, considering their respective origins.
How different from RC5 Posted Oct 2, 2003 13:14 UTC (Thu) by barrydavies (guest, #5372) [Link] http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.1.0/release_notes_1.1.html
How different from RC5 Posted Oct 1, 2003 16:57 UTC (Wed) by gbailey (guest, #58) [Link] Looks like it's RC5 renamed:
$ gunzip -Nl OOo_1.1.0_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz
compressed uncompressed ratio uncompressed_name
78347712 81459200 3.8% Oo_1.1rc5_LinuxIntel_install.tar
How different from RC5 Posted Oct 2, 2003 13:27 UTC (Thu) by cross (guest, #13601) [Link] No differences. Just did a diff on the two unpacked trees to make sure.
|
|
||||||||||||