Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
The cake, it was a lieThe cake, it was a liePosted Sep 26, 2012 4:37 UTC (Wed) by khim (subscriber, #9252)In reply to: The cake, it was a lie by jospoortvliet Parent article: GStreamer 1.0 released
Distro's don't want to have to ship the older versions as it is a lot of work to keep that all packaged. Yet another place where distributions are a problem not a solution.
(Log in to post comments)
The cake, it was a lie Posted Sep 27, 2012 11:17 UTC (Thu) by renox (subscriber, #23785) [Link]
>Yet another place where distributions are a problem not a solution.
Given that this is in a discussion about KDE and that the KDE projects shipped quite a few immature technology at the start of KDE4.x enabling them by default which meant that if a user wanted a stable KDE desktop he had to find a distribution which disabled those things (or do the work himself) I cannot help but finding this sentence funny.
The cake, it was a lie Posted Sep 27, 2012 13:05 UTC (Thu) by Jonno (subscriber, #49613) [Link]
>> Yet another place where distributions are a problem not a solution.
> Given that this is in a discussion about KDE and that the KDE projects shipped quite a few immature technology at the start of KDE4.x enabling them by default which meant that if a user wanted a stable KDE desktop he had to find a distribution which disabled those things (or do the work himself) I cannot help but finding this sentence funny. Well, given that the KDE project explicitly told distributions to stay with KDE 3.5 for their stable releases and only offer KDE 4.[01] as an option for the unwary, and the problem you described resulted from distributions choosing to ignore the upstream advice, I cannot help but find your statement ignorant ;-)
The cake, it was a lie Posted Sep 27, 2012 13:36 UTC (Thu) by renox (subscriber, #23785) [Link]
You assume that KDE4.[01] is the only one to have troubles, but PCLinuxOS still disabled Nepomuk much later than this..
|
|||||||||||||