| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Proprietary software--banned in Boston? (News.com)Proprietary software--banned in Boston? (News.com)Posted Oct 1, 2003 12:17 UTC (Wed) by petebull (guest, #7857)In reply to: Proprietary software--banned in Boston? (News.com) by zonker Parent article: Proprietary software--banned in Boston? (News.com)
> they run their site on FreeBSD and Apache.
(Log in to post comments)
Proprietary software--banned in Boston? (News.com) Posted Oct 1, 2003 14:40 UTC (Wed) by donwaugaman (subscriber, #4214) [Link] It does mean one thing - FOSS has shown by the webhosting company's example that it can be the price/performance leader in at least one domain.Something that should give CAGW some pause in their conclusion that this initiative will "limit competition and raise costs."
|
|
||||||||||||