right, the fundamental problem there is that it is 'guilty-until-proven-innocent' and not the other way around.
It's also one-directional; there do not seem to be any penalties if the 'rightsholders' make false claims (automated or not). So there is no incentive for them not to overshoot.
Posted Sep 7, 2012 13:03 UTC (Fri) by drag (subscriber, #31333)
[Link]
The fundamental problem here is people assume that "Intellectual Property Law" is legitimate just because it's a law or that 'people have a right to make money from their work'.