Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
Deadline scheduling: coming soon?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 27, 2013
ACPI for ARM?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 21, 2013
GNU virtual private Ethernet
if enabling A has a cost B saying "I want the benefits of A and I'm shocked that I'm having to pay the penalty B" == not good as well.
KS2012: Distributions and upstream
Posted Sep 6, 2012 22:09 UTC (Thu) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
You are free to run your custom kernel in RHEL. If there are issues, you might be asked to reproduce it against the distribution provided kernel. Anything else would be a undue burden on support.
Posted Sep 6, 2012 22:33 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
I understand that this is easier for Red Hat to provide support for, but this is a pretty strict straightjacket that defeats many of the benefits of FOSS software.
Posted Sep 7, 2012 3:02 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
Posted Sep 7, 2012 11:24 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
Posted Sep 7, 2012 18:35 UTC (Fri) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
That's why I specifically mentioned them, even though Suse and Oracle have the same policies (I don't know about Canonical)
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds