Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 16, 2013
A look at the PyPy 2.0 release
PostgreSQL 9.3 beta: Federated databases and more
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 9, 2013
(Nearly) full tickless operation in 3.10
PowerTOP tops up to 2.1
Posted Aug 30, 2012 22:04 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
which is "correct" for you?
which is "correct" for me?
since the changes don't persist across reboots, you can try them and if you don't notice any downside, set something up to change them for you permanently.
Posted Aug 30, 2012 22:29 UTC (Thu) by hp (subscriber, #5220)
Powertop mostly just makes me feel that my OS could have had good battery life but doesn't.
A doc blurb about the tradeoff for each toggle might go a long way though. Or if all of them have a "slowdown" worst case, one global blurb explaining that they're all safe but may cause performance decrease.
Posted Aug 30, 2012 23:00 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
So you need to take a risk at some point, and if the system crashes, don't use that option any longer.
These are the sorts of possible problems (along with the performance issues) that make it so that Fedora doesn't default all these things to the most power saving mode.
Some people seem to forget that the best way to have a computer save power is to never buy it in the first place. Computers are purchased to get things done, and that requires using power. How much power should be used depends on how valuable the result is to the person paying for it.
Posted Aug 30, 2012 23:07 UTC (Thu) by hp (subscriber, #5220)
no way I'm getting near that, basically. would rather just have bad battery life.
Posted Aug 30, 2012 23:21 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
Posted Sep 11, 2012 12:15 UTC (Tue) by Jannes (subscriber, #80396)
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds