Linux.conf.au has long been one of your editor's favorite events anywhere
in the world. It typically features one of the most diverse and
interesting programs and is hosted in a different city every year. And the
whole thing is fueled by that classic Australian energy and humor — even when
it is held in New Zealand. With well over a decade of history, LCA seems
like a solid and well established event. So it was a surprise to run
across a discussion suggesting that there might be no LCA in 2014. LCA, it
seems, has found itself needing to rethink how the conference is organized
Linux Australia council member James Polley started the discussion with a post on the
current status of LCA 2014:
Back in April, we announced the call for bids from parties
interested in hosting LCA 2014. According to the timeline posted
then, we should now be in the final stages of meeting with bid
teams and visiting the proposed venues, ready to make a decision in
the next few weeks.
This task turns out to be trivially simple, because to date we have
not received any bids. Several teams and individuals have expressed
an interest, but the number of bids received is zero.
James noted that LCA was once the only major community conference in
Australia; now, instead, there are several. Perhaps, he surmised, there is
no longer a need for LCA? Or, perhaps, it is time to move from volunteer
organizers to a professionally-managed event? Or, perhaps, it's time to
take a break and see if any interest develops for 2015?
Participants in the discussion raised a lot of concerns that the conference
has simply gotten too big and complex. Potential organizers, they say, are
being put off by the sheer time commitment required. Some past organizers
(such as Russell Stuart, Brisbane 2011)
disagreed, saying that the actual time
required is not as much as it seems. But there is no denying the fact that
LCA organizers tend to look awfully tired and haggard even at the beginning
of the event and thoroughly fried by the end. Putting together a
conference like LCA is a lot of work.
So it is natural to think about ways to reduce that work. Perhaps LCA
should go back to being a smaller event? There were proposals to reduce
the number of talk tracks, eliminate various social events, and even to
drop the 1-2 days of miniconfs that precede the conference itself. LCA did
not originally include miniconfs; they were first added by the Brisbane
team in 2002. But the miniconfs have since become an integral part of the
conference. Their contents are not under the control of the program
committee, with the result that the areas covered — and the quality — vary
widely. But the best miniconf talks tend to be quite good indeed, and the
miniconfs serve as an important entry path for speakers trying to get into
LCA proper. It would be a shame to lose them.
Another idea that came up was to settle down and have the conference in the
same city every year. That, in your editor's opinion, would risk repeating
the story of the Ottawa Linux Symposium. There is a long list of reasons
for that once-dominant conference's decline, but one of them was certainly
the organizers' unwillingness to move the event to new locations. Even a
city as nice as Ottawa gets a little tiresome after several years in a
row. A new location every year helps to keep LCA fresh and interesting.
The volunteer organizer model also helps in this regard. LCA has managed
to evolve a mechanism where each year's team is given a great deal of
freedom in how it runs the conference. Behind the scenes, though, a
"ghosts" committee (made up of prior organizers) oversees the effort,
provides advice, and sounds the alarm when it sees something in danger of
going wrong. The end result has been a conference that is, in some ways,
new every year, but which still runs like a smoothly oiled machine.
A shift to a professionally-organized event might take some strain off the
volunteer organizers but it would have to be done carefully
if it were not to kill the magic that has made LCA such a good event for so
many years. That would not be impossible to do; the Linux Plumbers
Conference has thrived with a great deal of organizational help from the
Linux Foundation. Such a setup requires professionals that are willing to
defer to the "amateurs" for most of the important decisions; it can be
done, but it's not something that happens by itself.
Donna Benjamin (Melbourne 2008) thinks
that workload issues could be addressed, perhaps with the help of
professional organizers and a team that is distributed across the country.
But, she says, there is another, more difficult problem: the fact that the
organizing team must sign up for a lot of criticism from the community.
If no one wants to run it because it's just too much work, the
workload can be addressed. But if no one wants to run it because
they don't want to sign up for the toxic bikeshedding - that's a
very different problem.
This sentiment was echoed by a number of other participants in the
discussion. In our community, it seems, no good deed goes unpunished; even
an event as well run as LCA is going to draw its share of complainers.
When a difficult job starts to appear thankless as well, the number of
volunteers is certain to decrease. But potential organizers should also
heed the words of Andrew Ruthven
The *most* important thing for any potential team to consider is
that running LCA is AWESOME. I'm going to repeat that, IT IS
AWESOME. What's more, we would do it again.
Finally, one could also argue that most conferences have a limited
lifetime. Linux Expo and LinuxWorld are long gone. Even the
much-respected Linux-Kongress, arguably the first Linux conference, was
last held in 2010. LCA, having started as the Conference of Australian
Linux Users in 1999, has certainly had a long run. Perhaps LCA, too, is
reaching the end of its life span?
Your editor does not believe that to be the case. We are not witnessing a
conference heading into senescence; instead, it is a middle-age crisis at
worst. There is too much that is valuable and unique worldwide in LCA, and
the people who attend the conference every year clearly appreciate it. LCA
can be seen as a sort of free software project that, after years of
success, needs to reevaluate its processes and governance. Once that task
is done, LCA is likely to be stronger and more vital than ever.
For 2014, the deadline for bids has been extended for a few weeks, so there
is still a chance for interested groups to sign up for a chance to host the
event. There is talk of putting together a distributed team that, most
likely, would propose to return LCA to Sydney. One expects that somebody
will step up to the plate and make the event happen; who knows, perhaps 2014
will be the year that LCA finally is held in Broome.
to post comments)