| |||||||||||||
There's a Verdict in Apple v. Samsung (Groklaw)There's a Verdict in Apple v. Samsung (Groklaw)Posted Aug 27, 2012 21:28 UTC (Mon) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)In reply to: There's a Verdict in Apple v. Samsung (Groklaw) by Kluge Parent article: There's a Verdict in Apple v. Samsung (Groklaw)
I believe it was a 9 person jury, randomly selected, and they did represent different viewpoints, including one viewpoint of a patent holder. Do you really think that juries should have their deliberations challenged by the lawyers of the case or did you just say that because you don't like the outcome? Fairness doesn't mean always getting what you want or everyone always agreeing, in fact that would be definitely un-fair.
(Log in to post comments)
There's a Verdict in Apple v. Samsung (Groklaw) Posted Aug 27, 2012 22:35 UTC (Mon) by bojan (subscriber, #14302) [Link]
> including one viewpoint of a patent holder
Please do yourself a favour and read his patent:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&...
Obvious, non-inventive, too general and filed 3 years after Tivo was a product.
More like viewpoint of a patent holder wannabe...
|
|||||||||||||