There's a Verdict in Apple v. Samsung (Groklaw)

Samsung wants to review verdict for inconsistencies
-- wonder if they caught this one ('381 != '301 below).
Or did groklaw retype with a typo?
________________________________________________________________________

Reading the verdict form [PDF]:

* 1. For each of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed Claim 19 of the ’381 Patent?

Answer: Yes, Samsung infringes Apple's '301 patent, all devices
________________________________________________________________________