| |||||||||||||
Signed overflow optimization hazards in the kernelSigned overflow optimization hazards in the kernelPosted Aug 20, 2012 0:44 UTC (Mon) by PaulMcKenney (subscriber, #9624)In reply to: Signed overflow optimization hazards in the kernel by baldrick Parent article: Signed overflow optimization hazards in the kernel
No problem!
I must admit that it would be nice if "(signed typeof(a))" and (unsigned typeof(b))" flipped the signedness of "a" and "b", but my version of gcc really doesn't like either variant. ;-)
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||