| |||||||||||||
McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux?McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux?Posted Aug 19, 2012 5:05 UTC (Sun) by Kamilion (subscriber, #42576)In reply to: McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux? by mpr22 Parent article: McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux?
Heh heh -- there's one way... http://www.wazhack.com/
Developer is committed to Unity4's linux support (when unity4's release occurs)
(Been playing it recently on my android tablet a lot, so in a way, there's already linux support, just not X support.)
(Log in to post comments)
McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux? Posted Aug 19, 2012 14:45 UTC (Sun) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784) [Link] That's not a Nethack variant. That's a new roguelike. (Which, for good measure, runs on a rather more restricted set of platforms than Nethack.) If you want to understand what I'm talking about, read the Nethack source code. Bringing a bottle of brain bleach might be advisable.
McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux? Posted Aug 19, 2012 21:55 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
There's nothing wrong with the nethack source code! (As long as you consider that e.g. modifying string constants is "not wrong"...)
The nethack source is very like nethack itself: an intricate and wonderful maze filled with treasure and surprises and hidden secrets and traps and terrifying monsters of every kind. I actually prefer reading the nethack source to playing nethack. (But perhaps I am strange.)
|
|||||||||||||