| |||||||||||||
The GNOME project at 15The GNOME project at 15Posted Aug 18, 2012 23:58 UTC (Sat) by sramkrishna (guest, #72628)In reply to: The GNOME project at 15 by Jandar Parent article: The GNOME project at 15
Me too. It clearly said beta. Unfortunately, people say "4.0" and said "oh, stable". So I think the lesson there was to say "beta" and call it 3.99.9 or something like that.
(Log in to post comments)
The GNOME project at 15 Posted Sep 1, 2012 15:13 UTC (Sat) by rich0 (guest, #55509) [Link]
That, and keep releasing new versions that are lower-numbered.
You can't abandon KDE 3.5 and then say that people shouldn't have migrated to 4. The current version is whatever keeps getting bugfixes.
Most serious software packages don't just do all bugfixing at the bleeding edge. Heck, the kernel still has full support for v3.0 and v3.4, with later versions not having longer-term promises (they're the equivalent of KDE 4 or 3.99.9 or whatever).
|
|||||||||||||