| |||||||||||||
ACCESS_ONCE()ACCESS_ONCE()Posted Aug 17, 2012 10:37 UTC (Fri) by dgm (subscriber, #49227)In reply to: ACCESS_ONCE() by daglwn Parent article: ACCESS_ONCE()
typeof() is clearly something acceptable in gcc's C dialect. Or have they removed their own extension without the word noticing?
(Log in to post comments)
ACCESS_ONCE() Posted Aug 20, 2012 10:07 UTC (Mon) by etienne (subscriber, #25256) [Link]
The thing is, can the type returned by typeof() be modified by adding the "volatile" keyword, how much can it be modified (how to remove volatility, possible to change the sign-ness by adding signed/unsigned)...
|
|||||||||||||