| |||||||||||||
McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux?McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux?Posted Aug 14, 2012 16:06 UTC (Tue) by drag (subscriber, #31333)In reply to: McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux? by miahfost Parent article: McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux?
Unless your daemons are setup to support run with systemd and the init configuration is migrated to unit files then it really just amounts to a overgrown SysV init. You are not probably going to gain much benefit from installing it.
I don't know how well systemd integrates into Debian when you install it, but considering that it's just one of three different init systems I can't imagine that it is good.
(Log in to post comments)
McRae: Are We Removing What Defines Arch Linux? Posted Aug 14, 2012 17:26 UTC (Tue) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
It's pretty good. A lot of services are now shipping unit files (which automatically override SysV scripts).
|
|||||||||||||