| |||||||||||||
The troubles with release namesThe troubles with release namesPosted Aug 9, 2012 6:48 UTC (Thu) by Wummel (subscriber, #7591)In reply to: The troubles with release names by JoeBuck Parent article: The troubles with release names Exactly. Codenames are nice if you have good marketing and people connect the product with the name. Fedora does not do that. So Red hat should just remove the silly names.
(Log in to post comments)
The troubles with release names Posted Aug 9, 2012 8:44 UTC (Thu) by dgm (subscriber, #49227) [Link]
Silly names can be marketing on their own. I assure you that quite a few people are more aware of Fedora after Beefy.
The troubles with release names Posted Aug 9, 2012 10:43 UTC (Thu) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648) [Link] Sure they're more aware, but in a positive way?
The troubles with release names Posted Aug 9, 2012 11:47 UTC (Thu) by dgm (subscriber, #49227) [Link]
That's largely a function of Fedora quality, not the name ;-)
The troubles with release names Posted Aug 9, 2012 15:14 UTC (Thu) by smoogen (subscriber, #97) [Link]
In this case it is the community wanting something whether Red Hat wants it or not. So the names continue.
|
|||||||||||||