|| ||ebiederm-AT-xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) |
|| ||Sasha Levin <levinsasha928-AT-gmail.com> |
|| ||Re: [RFC 1/4] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable |
|| ||Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:40:38 -0700|
|| ||Josh Triplett <josh-AT-joshtriplett.org>, Tejun Heo <tj-AT-kernel.org>, torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org, akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-mm-AT-kvack.org, paul.gortmaker-AT-windriver.com|
|| ||Article, Thread
Sasha Levin <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Heh, I've started working on it in April, and just returned to this. Didn't think about rebasing
to something new.
> will fix - Thanks!
You might want to look at some of the work that Eric Dumazet has done in
the networking stack with rcu hashtables that can be resized.
For a trivial hash table I don't know if the abstraction is worth it.
For a hash table that starts off small and grows as big as you need it
the incent to use a hash table abstraction seems a lot stronger.
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to email@example.com. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"firstname.lastname@example.org"> email@example.com </a>
to post comments)