By Nathan Willis
August 7, 2012
Adobe surprised many in open source circles with its August 2 release
of Source Sans Pro, an open font made available under the standard SIL
Open Font License (OFL). Adobe has not historically been an open
source player (beyond its involvement with standard file formats like
PDF or SVG), so Source Sans Pro is not only its first foray into open
fonts, but may also herald an interest in adopting open source
development methods.
Designer Paul Hunt announced the font in a post
on the Adobe typography blog. The font is available in six
weights, with regular and italic versions for each. The first release
covers an extended Latin character set, but according to the comments
other writing systems are reportedly still to come. Downloads are hosted
at SourceForge.net.
Hunt said Adobe created the new font to provide a user interface (UI)
font for the company's open source software projects, including its Strobe media playback framework and Brackets code editor, both of which are web applications.
An open font allows Adobe to control the UI by delivering the font to
the user's browser via CSS's @font-face rule.
The design of the font is inspired by early-20th-Century gothics from
American Type Founders, such as News Gothic and Franklin Gothic, but
it is the original work of Hunt and not a derivative of those
originals. This distinction is a subtle one, but comparing Source
Sans Pro to News Cycle
(which is my own open font designed as a faithful revival of News
Gothic), there are clear differences. In addition to miscellaneous
differences between specific glyphs, Source Sans Pro is set wider, is
a bit rounder, includes a bit more contrast, and incorporates a
different approach to accents. Hunt said in the blog post that he
intentionally paid attention to distinguishing between l (lower-case
L), I (upper-case i), and 1 (the numeral), which was a less common
concern a century ago.
Although the font covers "only" Latin characters, the
implementation supports a wide array of languages that use the
variations of the basic Latin alphabet (such as additional base
characters and diacritic marks). Some of the languages supported,
such as Vietnamese, Romanized Chinese, Navajo, and various Eastern
European languages, are often under-served by even the commercial font
industry. The font also includes some typographic features often
omitted from open fonts, such as old-style or "text figure"
numerals and alternate styles of various letters (such as variations
of I (upper-case i) with and without horizontal top- and bottom-caps,
which can further distinguish it from l and 1).
There are also Multiple Master (MM) versions of the fonts included in the
release, which is unusual. MM fonts are a rarely-employed format
developed at Adobe, in which a set of parameters (usually weight and
width) can be adjusted at will to change the appearance of the font.
For example, an MM font might ship with an Extra Light and an Extra Black
version, representing the lightest and darkest ends of the weight
spectrum. The user can then use MM to interpolate smoothly between
these extremes to find the right look for the project at hand. It is
a clever idea, and spares the designer the overhead of producing
separate versions for Extra Light, Light, Demi Bold, Bold, Extra Bold,
and so on, ad nauseum.
Similarly, the differences between Condensed and Extra Wide
versions can be interpolated to produce various widths in between.
Software could naively interpolate between two widths of a non-MM
font, too, but the naive approach produces undesirable results (such
as fattening or squeezing the line widths in addition to the open
spaces of the characters). The MM format is designed to produce
eye-pleasing output. In practice, though, most people rarely use
more than one or two weight or width variations, so MM has not taken
the world by storm.
Building
The release itself is in the form of Zip archives, one of which
contains the fonts themselves in both TrueType and OpenType CFF
format, and one of which contains the fonts plus the source files used
to generate them. The contents of the source package will not be easy
to take advantage of for Linux users, however. It consists of spline
font sources (in Postscript .SFA format), sources for the proprietary
Fontlab editor (in .VFB format), and a set of auxiliary text files
used by Adobe's build tools. These text files contain information
such as hinting, kerning pairs, and tables of characters composed out
of other components (primarily accented letters). The auxiliary files
are built for use with Adobe Font
Development Kit for OpenType (AFDKO), Adobe's "font SDK."
AFDKO implements the font-building portion of Adobe's font development
workflow. The glyph outlines are developed in a separate application
(such as Fontlab) in PostScript Type 1 format. AFDKO includes
proofing and validation tools, plus scripts that add OpenType
features (such as substitution rules or stylistic alternates)
based on text configuration files like those included with the Source
Sans Pro package. It also includes scripts to build installable font
files. Although the documentation
says several of the individual scripts in AFDKO are open source, the
download as a whole is not; the license
agreement forbids reverse-engineering. The auxiliary files themselves
are not in a standard, documented format that other tools can utilize.
However, that does not mean the auxiliary files are of no value. Some
of their information could be extracted with minimal fuss and the
judicious application of scripting. Many of the same features can
also be extracted from the font files themselves in an open source
editor like FontForge. Vernon Adams, developer of KDE's Oxygen font,
commented
on the blog post that he was interested in extracting the
horizontal spacing information from Source Sans Pro and adapting it to
Oxygen.
In the purely-open-source font development workflow, adding OpenType
features to a font is typically done in FontForge — although it is far
from pleasant. FontForge hides the necessary options and tools
remarkably well, and effectively dictates that building the final font
files be done manually. Better command-line tools like those in AFDKO
could help automate the procedure. Intriguingly enough, several
commenters in the blog post discussion raised questions about AFDKO,
and Hunt replied
with interest asking what would be necessary to make the release
buildable on Linux.
In reply, Hunt got advice not just on the build process, but on how to
set up Source Sans Pro as a "real" project and not just a Zip-dump —
including issue tracking, revision control, and a development mailing
list. He gave a hopeful-sounding response:
Thanks for bringing up these points. As this is our first open source
offering, these are all matters we will have to deal with going
forward. This is just the beginning of this journey for us, so please
be patient as we try to figure out things along the way. I will
personally look into the issues you bring up here and be working on a
plan on how to address these items where we can.
Bug reports and fixes are already beginning to queue up, too. Several
on the Open Font Library list noticed problems with the weight values
of the fonts (numeric metadata used to sort the various "light" to
"heavy" versions of the font). As John Haltiwanger put it, "And
(finally) we are legally allowed to fix a broken element in an Adobe
font!"
Fonts and project management
Adobe is not alone among open font projects that come up short on bug
tracking, revision control, and other development tools. Only a few
large font projects tackle these challenges, and they do so in decidedly
different ways. DejaVu, Liberation, SIL, and Ubuntu all employ
different methods for tracking issues and feature requests, managing
source code, merging patches, and making releases. Individuals
working on a handful of personal font projects are even less likely to
deploy such support utilities.
The lack of formal source code repositories and issue trackers
generally means that distributions undertake the work of packaging and
testing open fonts. Because Source Sans Pro relies on the non-free
Fontlab and AFDKO, one might think it has scant chances of working its
way into distribution packages, but Fedora's Ian Weller observed
that Fedora's guidelines do not require that a font be
buildable with open source software alone — they merely
recommend it. A Fedora review
request was opened on August 4. There is also a package
request for the font in Debian, although Debian's guidelines
dictate that a font with a non-free build path will be packaged for
contrib.
There are a few inconsistencies in the Zip files, such as which
feature files are present in which directories, and which include .SFA
versus .VFB source files. Those are problems that source code
management would help quash. Hunt also teased the future release
of a monospace version of the font, which would be of particular
interest to developers. Seeing such ongoing work in the open would
also be a nice touch, and would allow the community to contribute to
the process. However, one should not lose sight of Source Sans Pro's
importance even in Zip format: Adobe has released its first open font,
its team seems well aware of the issues involved (licensing and
tool support included), and is expressing interest in fitting the
project into the expected conventions and procedures of open source.
(
Log in to post comments)