| |||||||||||||
McCann: Cross Cut [the future of Nautilus]McCann: Cross Cut [the future of Nautilus]Posted Aug 5, 2012 14:20 UTC (Sun) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106)In reply to: McCann: Cross Cut [the future of Nautilus] by ovitters Parent article: McCann: Cross Cut [the future of Nautilus]
> It is indeed really really slow in the current version. That is not how it should be in the stable version; then it should be quick.
And if (or should I say "When"?) it's not? Will the changes all be reverted at that time, or will the "fix" be to wait and see if it can be made faster and/or for people who have a problem stop complaining?
> Suggest to give a bit of leeway to unstable versions.
Leeway requires trust and that, I think, is something that is in short supply where GNOME is concerned.
(Log in to post comments)
McCann: Cross Cut [the future of Nautilus] Posted Aug 7, 2012 21:53 UTC (Tue) by zlynx (subscriber, #2285) [Link]
And is "quick" going to require running a indexing service that will destroy any vestige of speed and responsiveness remaining in the system?
When indexing daemons can make an 8 core system with a SSD feel like a 486, they had better not be required because they are going to be disabled and removed pronto, unless the desktop environment is simply abandoned instead.
|
|||||||||||||