| |||||||||||||
Gentoo debates recruitment schemesGentoo debates recruitment schemesPosted Jul 26, 2012 19:17 UTC (Thu) by jospoortvliet (subscriber, #33164)In reply to: Gentoo debates recruitment schemes by boudewijn Parent article: Gentoo debates recruitment schemes
yup, and openSUSE also manages to get by just fine without such bureaucracies. I won't call it ridiculous outright but it certainly doesn't sit well by me.
(Log in to post comments)
Gentoo debates recruitment schemes Posted Aug 2, 2012 12:22 UTC (Thu) by TRauMa (guest, #16483) [Link]
But there is a company behind it, which means full time employees and a hidden bureaucracy layer. Gentoo doesn't have that.
Gentoo debates recruitment schemes Posted Sep 6, 2012 9:34 UTC (Thu) by jospoortvliet (subscriber, #33164) [Link]
True, SUSE and the other companies behind openSUSE mudd the waters a bit here. But Gentoo has corporate involvement too, does it not?
Gentoo debates recruitment schemes Posted Oct 3, 2012 23:51 UTC (Wed) by Duncan (guest, #6647) [Link]
> SUSE ... openSUSE.
> Gentoo has corporate involvement too, does it not?
Not in the same way. While various companies (corporation and otherwise) may provide mirrors and/or donate hardware and the like, and google itself is a notable example of a gentoo downstream (with chromeOS), gentoo seems to be much like the kde of the front-page article, in that it's very much individual developer driven, with companies as such not allowed to get too close.
I believe there's a parallel to debian there. Both gentoo and debian are 100% community distros without a sponsoring corporate parent, as such. The model is quite different from that of fedora/rh, or opensuse/suse, or mandriva (closer to mageia I guess).
It occurs to me that I don't know where arch fits in, community/corporate-sponsorship-wise.
Duncan
|
|||||||||||||