| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
What happens next:What happens next:Posted Sep 24, 2003 21:16 UTC (Wed) by phgrenet (guest, #5979)In reply to: What happens next: by coriordan Parent article: Text of the proposed EU patent directive Why do you say that the directive is bad as it is? It excludes patents on pure software and business methods. It just re-enforces Art. 52 of the EPC.
(Log in to post comments)
it's Good Posted Sep 24, 2003 22:29 UTC (Wed) by coriordan (guest, #7544) [Link] > Why do you say that the directive is bad as it is?I didn't say it was bad. (?) Are you refering to my comments about scenario (a)? Scenario (a) is that the directive is adopted *without* the plenarys amendments, which is bad. The amemdments that the plenary adopted are great, couldn't be better, but the Council doesn't have to accept them.
|
|
||||||||||||