Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 16, 2013
A look at the PyPy 2.0 release
PostgreSQL 9.3 beta: Federated databases and more
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 9, 2013
(Nearly) full tickless operation in 3.10
Debian should take away the freedom of its users and developers to talk about non-free software in order to be endorsed by the FSF?
non-free mailinglists mandated by the FSF?
Posted Jul 12, 2012 14:35 UTC (Thu) by Jonno (subscriber, #49613)
The discouragement could be as simple as a template response to any support questions on Debian mailing lists and forums, telling them that non-free software is not part of Debian and asking them to go somewhere else for help (though notably not telling them where they can get such help).
Both users and developers would still be free to discuss the use of non-free software, as long as they don't do so under the umbrella of the Debian project.
Posted Jul 12, 2012 16:44 UTC (Thu) by nickbp (subscriber, #63605)
Posted Jul 12, 2012 16:58 UTC (Thu) by nickbp (subscriber, #63605)
The answer, if a developer were permitted to provide it, would be to install linux-firmware-nonfree, which includes a binary blob necessary for radeon to support 3d acceleration on my card. I only discovered this solution myself when skimming Xorg.0.log; would the log entry mentioning the lack of a binary blob be removed as well?
Before discovering the correct solution, I was considering simply buying a new nvidia card, which would have brought me completely back into the fold of proprietary video drivers, and left me with the (incorrect) assumption that radeon was unsuitable for regular use.
Posted Jul 16, 2012 17:45 UTC (Mon) by BenHutchings (subscriber, #37955)
I'm not sure we've got the conditions for warning messages quite right: some users (such as you) evidently don't see any messages, and some see them several times even though the firmware isn't needed for their specific hardware.
There is also an ongoing issue with radeon where the upstream developers try to make it functional without the non-free firmware but this doesn't seem to work with many of the newer chips (it's not just slow but may fail to generate a display at all).
Posted Jul 12, 2012 19:42 UTC (Thu) by Jonno (subscriber, #49613)
Though in that particular case, I'd say you would be better off taking your problems to WineHQ anyway, as any problem with a windows application in Wine is likely to be 1) independent of distribution, and 2) not really related to the wine packages themselves.
As for your second use-case of the radeon firmware blobs, that would really only work if there was a separate community for the non-free and contrib components (see my other comment about that), in which case getting a canned response about software freedom would be a big hint for non-purists to go looking there instead (while purists could blame the hw and go buy Intel instead).
Posted Jul 12, 2012 19:47 UTC (Thu) by nickbp (subscriber, #63605)
Posted Jul 17, 2012 12:08 UTC (Tue) by KotH (subscriber, #4660)
Yes, it's the FSF form of censorship. And i'm quite surprised that people do not outright refuse it.
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds