SCO as tactical diversion - from EU SW patents.
Posted Sep 24, 2003 6:50 UTC (Wed) by
guybar (subscriber, #798)
Parent article:
SCO to Red Hat: you have no complaint
SCO's actions do not make sense even for microsoft and sun,
the allegged puppetmasters, since in the long run, once SCO
loses, linux will be strengthened.
By this view, a pump-n-dump scheme, though it may very well exist,
does not in itself explain's MS's and sun's financial expenditure.
If these actions do not make sense by themselves, one must look
for a larger context for an explanation. And the only reasonable interpertation I see is that SCO is a tactical diversion.
If this is true, then comes the question: What is the real
maneuver, the actually effective action that the SCO feint is
ment to cover up with deflating the SNR ?
The obvious answer is the European parlament software patent
litigation which can, potentially, cause effective harm to FOSS,
at least in the medium timerange.
And indeed, this SCO buisness, with its obvious lies,
glaring half truths, and plain stupid incinerating statements,
seems like a calculated, very successful flamebait.
Most of the FOSS-related and general media had enthusiastically
taken the bait; just compare the numbers of SCO-related and
EP-SW-patents-related articles and stories to see the result.
One has to wonder how this can be changed.
(
Log in to post comments)