| |||||||||||||
Updates and an announcement from LWNUpdates and an announcement from LWNPosted Jul 5, 2012 11:32 UTC (Thu) by Cato (subscriber, #7643)In reply to: Updates and an announcement from LWN by aggelos Parent article: Updates and an announcement from LWN
I saw a comment that one site got 25% of its traffic from social media such as Facebook, Twitter, etc (I think it was Techcrunch but couldn't swear to it). So they do make quite a big difference in some cases.
If it's done carefully via a one or two click model, perhaps via separate page so that visitors/subscribers who hate this sort of thing are not tracked, it would let those who do use social media share LWN links more easily.
(Log in to post comments)
Updates and an announcement from LWN Posted Jul 5, 2012 16:01 UTC (Thu) by fatrat (subscriber, #1518) [Link]
But the whole "only see it for free after a week" model breaks the +1/Like.
If I like this article today, my friends can't read it.
I'm not a fan.
But please, yes to a mobile site. I often read content on my phone or a table, and the current design doesn't work well there.
Updates and an announcement from LWN Posted Jul 6, 2012 9:51 UTC (Fri) by bosyber (subscriber, #84963) [Link]
Given there's the "Send a free link" for articles that are not yet freely visible, I don't think that's really true. Using that link in a tweet works pretty well.
Updates and an announcement from LWN Posted Jul 5, 2012 16:15 UTC (Thu) by aggelos (subscriber, #41752) [Link] I saw a comment that one site got 25% of its traffic from social media such as Facebook, Twitter, etc (I think it was Techcrunch but couldn't swear to it). So they do make quite a big difference in some cases.Um, that does not imply that people wouldn't spread links around w/o the "social" buttons. It might make it easier for some, but clearly the 25% would be more like an upper bound.
|
|||||||||||||