Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 23, 2013
An "enum" for Python 3
An unexpected perf feature
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 16, 2013
A look at the PyPy 2.0 release
The release early and often is exactly what the 6 month cycle makes possible. Feature based results in way fewer releases.
I think LWN explained once quite nicely the benefits of time based releases. Also that various projects are moving towards this.
I find the firefox model quite interesting. But I'm not how to make that work in practice when you have loads and loads of modules, all with their own dependencies on eachother.
openSUSE rethinks its release process
Posted Jun 28, 2012 15:22 UTC (Thu) by gvy (guest, #11981)
I think that 6-month release cycle for something of a Linux distribution size is just plain crazy marketing -- the realistic lengths being somewhere between 12 and 18 months depending on the scope for "generic base" distros, and rather closer to two years for actually supportable ones.
Heck, even Mr. Shuttlewraith seems to understand that with LTS releases.
Disclaimer: I'm contributing to ALT Linux since 2001 and quite a few of the things this article talks about sound quite familiar; my best wishes to openSUSE team sorting it all out.
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds