| |||||||||||||
Old newsOld newsPosted Jun 26, 2012 19:18 UTC (Tue) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)In reply to: Old news by hamjudo Parent article: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.3
I see a lot of companies just sticking with RHEL 5.x because it just works and there isn't any significant functionality missing.
(Log in to post comments)
Old news Posted Jun 28, 2012 10:04 UTC (Thu) by rwmj (subscriber, #5474) [Link]
If you're using virtualization, then RHEL 6 is a massive improvement on RHEL 5 (and RHEL 7 will be another huge step forward).
Old news Posted Jun 28, 2012 14:19 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
rwmj is too modest to say *why* RHEL6 is a massive improvement over RHEL5 for virtualization. libvirt has a lot to do with that, so thank you, rwmj :)
Old news Posted Jun 28, 2012 15:11 UTC (Thu) by rwmj (subscriber, #5474) [Link]
Well to be fair I'm not so much involved in libvirt. But libguestfs had a massive upgrade in functionality in RHEL 6.3. The release notes cover all the changes between old 1.8 and new 1.16:
|
|||||||||||||