| |||||||||||||
No signed kernel, just a signed boot loaderNo signed kernel, just a signed boot loaderPosted Jun 26, 2012 19:14 UTC (Tue) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)In reply to: No signed kernel, just a signed boot loader by marcH Parent article: Details on Ubuntu's UEFI secure boot plan
Oh har har har, Mr Sarcastic guy. In any event I am merely relating the understanding and rationale that Fedora and Canonical have publicly written. The fact that the OP doesn't seem to want to read or understand that is the issue I'm trying to correct.
Foolish on my part I suppose. http://xkcd.com/386/
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||