| |||||||||||||
No signed kernel, just a signed boot loaderNo signed kernel, just a signed boot loaderPosted Jun 26, 2012 7:27 UTC (Tue) by ssmith32 (subscriber, #72404)In reply to: No signed kernel, just a signed boot loader by jspaleta Parent article: Details on Ubuntu's UEFI secure boot plan
You seem to have a lot of faith in municipal power companies commitment to security...
Unfortunately, regardless of the "should", there are plenty of examples to the contrary.
Whatever the original intent, in reality, UEFI's largest impact so far has been to impose a significant cost on open-source software, with the to-be-determined security benefits still vaporware..
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||