LWN.net Logo

Pettenò: Debunking x32 myths

Pettenò: Debunking x32 myths

Posted Jun 26, 2012 3:38 UTC (Tue) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
In reply to: Pettenò: Debunking x32 myths by ringerc
Parent article: Pettenò: Debunking x32 myths

one thing you are missing, you use x32 with a 64 bit kernel, so the kernel doesn't have memory limits, your only limit is 4G of address space per process (and the kernel needs almost none of that)

As a result, any system up to 4G is perfectly happy as x32, and if the system is doing more than one thing, you could easily get 16G or larger systems without needing 64 bit binaries.

And if you are doing VMs, this is the size of the VM, not the size of the overall system.


(Log in to post comments)

Pettenò: Debunking x32 myths

Posted Jun 26, 2012 5:06 UTC (Tue) by ringerc (subscriber, #3071) [Link]

The context of the reply was someone proposing an "x32" kernel.

x32 userspace with an x64 kernel makes sense (ish) and that's all the x32 folks themselves ever proposed.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds