| |||||||||||||
Details on Ubuntu's UEFI secure boot planDetails on Ubuntu's UEFI secure boot planPosted Jun 23, 2012 15:07 UTC (Sat) by blitzkrieg3 (subscriber, #57873)In reply to: Details on Ubuntu's UEFI secure boot plan by dbruce Parent article: Details on Ubuntu's UEFI secure boot plan
> IANAL, but I don't think that can happen. It seems to me that in the above scenario, the manufacturer would be in violation of the GPLv3.
IANAL either. You're forgetting that the manufacturer and Ubuntu have a relationship. If Dell for example accidentally ships a locked down firmware and is in violation, and to be compliant they would need the signing key, they would put pretty significant pressure on Canonical to release the key.
(Log in to post comments)
Details on Ubuntu's UEFI secure boot plan Posted Jun 24, 2012 1:52 UTC (Sun) by Fowl (subscriber, #65667) [Link] Surely they could just release an update that would fix their bug.
|
|||||||||||||