Posted Jun 21, 2012 19:04 UTC (Thu) by josh (subscriber, #17465)
[Link]
And only one of those can own zork.com today, so the issue still applies. The same first-come-first-served rule applies, but without the added confusing of having zork.{com,net,org,biz,bz,co,co.uk,...} all mean different things.
So, one will get zork, one will get zork-enterprises, one will get zorkinc, and so on.
ICANN adds new gTLDs
Posted Jun 21, 2012 19:24 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Posted Jun 23, 2012 23:52 UTC (Sat) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
[Link]
but you can have zork.com.uk etc.
it's very easy to end up with conflicting names, and any global naming scheme that you create will have problems dealing with the conflicts. There's nothing inherently wrong with any option, it's just a question of how people end up using it.
ICANN adds new gTLDs
Posted Jun 21, 2012 19:45 UTC (Thu) by nybble41 (subscriber, #55106)
[Link]
Strictly speaking, to avoid confusion the DNS namespace should probably be divided up according to trademark domains, i.e. zork.games.pto.us, or by corporate registration, i.e. zonk.corp.md.us. Then it would be up to the PTO and/or the state to ensure unique and non-confusing names within their respective domains. The UN or WTO or similar international organization could manage a TLD for the truly international domains. Finally, we would need a place for personal domains, perhaps under each ccTLD based on citizenship.
Besides the ccTLDs and a small number of international domains (.intl or .un, .wto, etc.) there would be no other TLDs.