| |||||||||||||
Vignatti: X on WaylandVignatti: X on WaylandPosted Jun 15, 2012 17:54 UTC (Fri) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)In reply to: Vignatti: X on Wayland by nix Parent article: Vignatti: X on Wayland
And I don't care about fringe users. Why should the whole architecture of the stack be geared towards them, harming 99% of 'common' users along the way?
I'm not against crazy WMs like RatPoison or XMonad, but only when their existence does not require additional expense from other users.
(Log in to post comments)
Vignatti: X on Wayland Posted Jun 15, 2012 19:14 UTC (Fri) by marm (guest, #53705) [Link]
Maybe because those 1% of people are those who bring you your OS kernel, compilers and device drivers? ;-)
Anyway, I don't see the "all policy belongs to the window manager" model in X harming anybody, as opposed to systems which take choices away from the users.
Vignatti: X on Wayland Posted Jun 15, 2012 22:56 UTC (Fri) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
Not really. Most kernel developers use pretty standard distributions these days.
|
|||||||||||||