Backing up in trees with Obnam 1.0

Lars Wirzenius's new backup tool Obnam was just declared 1.0. There is no shortage of backup options these days, and in some way Wirzenius's decision to scratch his own itch with the project is par for the course. But the program does offer a different feature set than many of its competitors.

For starters, Obnam makes only "snapshot" backups — that is, every backup looks like a complete snapshot of the system: there are not separate "full" and "incremental" backup options. That obviates the need to separately configure full and incremental backups on different schedules, and it similarly simplifies the restoration process. Any snapshot can be restored, without "walking" a chain of deltas from a full backup starting position. In his 1.0 release announcement, Wirzenius argues that full-plus-incremental backups make sense for tape drives, where sequential access favors adding deltas with incremental changes after an initial full backup, but that hard-disk backups make the incremental delta approach pointless.

But the sneaky part is that under the hood, Obnam's snapshots are all incremental, at least in the sense that each snapshot only records changes since the last. The difference is that they are stored in copy-on-write (COW) b-trees like those Btrfs uses for filesystems. Any snapshot can be reconstructed from the b-tree, and individual snapshots can be removed by deleting their node and re-attaching the sub-trees. To make the COW b-tree approach space-efficient, it uses pervasive automatic data de-duplication. The same chunk of data on disk is re-used — both across multiple files and over multiple snapshot generations. In addition to saving space by not duplicating files that have not changed between snapshots, moving or renaming large files does not result in duplicate copies of the bits. By default, Obnam uses one-megabyte chunks, although this setting is adjustable in Obnam's configuration file.

Obnam sports other features of practical value, such as built-in GnuPG encryption, which Wirzenius cited as a weakness in most rsync-based backup tools. It also works with local disks or over the network, including NFS, SMB, and SFTP. Wirzenius admits that the latter protocol is slow, but that SCP (which should be faster) lacks support for tracking information like file removals, which Obnam depends on. In network backup setups, Obnam supports both push (client-initiated) and pull (server-initiated) backup sessions.

Storing and retrieving

Installation requires several of Wirzenius's other code projects, including his B-tree library larch and terminal status-update library ttystatus, plus paramiko a third-party SSH2 library. Most are packaged for Debian (Wirzenius packages his own projects for Debian), but not all of them are available in downstream derivatives like Ubuntu. He provides an Apt repository for the necessary packages; instructions and a link to the repository's signing key are provided on his Obnam tutorial page.

The tutorial goes into further detail about Obnam's data de-duplication with practical examples. You can create a new backup with

    obnam backup ~/projectfoo

and subsequently back up a parent directory with

    obnam backup ~

Rather than re-save the files from projectfoo, the new backup will point to the copy already on disk. Each backup created with Obnam is specific to a directory; you can exclude specific subdirectories with the --exclude= flag, but you cannot backup several directories in a single command.

The tutorial also explains that Obnam automatically saves checkpoints every 100MB while creating a new backup. This is valuable because the initial snapshot is always akin to a full backup in other tools, and can be large enough to introduce failures. Checkpoints are not guaranteed to preserve the entire data set as are regular snapshots; they only allow an interrupted backup to resume without starting over from scratch.

Obnam's basic usage is straightforward; the same obnam backup ~ command that is used to start a new backup in the above example is used verbatim to perform the subsequent snapshots. You store snapshots on a remote repository by appending --repository=URL, specify a filesystem storage location with --output=PATH, and specify a GnuPG encryption key with --encrypt-with=KEYID.

You can restore a directory from a snapshot with

    obnam restore --to=/mnt/recovery-volume ~

(which will restore the most recent snapshot of your home directory to /mnt/recovery-volume). You can optionally restore just a file or a subdirectory from the snapshot with

    obnam restore ~/importantfiles --to=/mnt/recovery-volume ~

You can also specify a specific intermediate snapshot by appending a --generation=N flag to the restore command; you can get a list of the available snapshots by running obnam generations. The obnam verify command checks snapshot data against the files on disk, and obnam fsck checks the internal consistency of the b-tree.

Forgetfulness

The only real confusing part of working with Obnam is the snapshot retention process. You can tell the program to immediately delete older snapshots by running

    obnam forget --keep=7d

(which will keep the most recent seven days' worth of snapshots), or some variation. The wrinkle is that the 7d attribute will keep only one backup per day for those seven days, even if you run Obnam hourly. To keep seven days' worth of hourly snapshots, you would need to specify --keep=168h.

You can set a snapshot retention policy in your configuration file that uses these rules in combination. You can retain hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly snapshots by providing a comma-separated list. For example, 12h,7d,3m will keep the last 12 hourly snapshots, the last seven daily snapshots, and the last three monthly snapshots. When the numbers start to converge (such as the last 48 hourly snapshots and last two daily snapshots) is when the potential for miscounting sets in; Wirzenius recommends that you try your retention policy on the command line with the --pretend option to simulate results before deploying them in the real world.

In an email, Wirzenius elaborated a bit on those tricky multi-factor retention policies. Each retention rule (e.g., hour, day, or month) is examined separately by Obnam, he said, and a snapshot is kept if it matches any of the rules. So a 48h,2d policy would match 48 hourly snapshots, then match two additional daily snapshots, for 50 total.

As of the 1.0 release, there are a few areas that need improvement, such as managing multiple clients storing snapshots on one repository; Wirzenius says that further thought is required before implementing a real "server mode." For example, two or more machines can run Obnam and push their backups to the same remote repository, and they will be tagged with the hostname of origin. However, Obnam can also be run from the repository machine and "pull" backups from the two remote sources, but in that case each one needs to specify a client name with the --client-name= flag in order for Obnam to keep their metadata separate.

In practice, my interest in backup utilities stems largely from how rarely I make good backups on a regular basis (i.e., paranoia). I may be atypical in that way, but the primary reasons I have abandoned most of the backup utilities I have test driven in the past are the overhead in keeping track of full and incremental backup schedules and the lack of good tools for rotating old backups out without manual intervention. Obnam scores on both of those metrics. If you have a complicated setup with multiple machines, you may find quirks (such as the client name issue or the speed of SFTP) working against you, but Wirzenius is still at work on the code — and he seems quite happy to take bug reports and questions.

---

(Log in to post comments)