| |||||||||||||
Debian Diversity statement acceptedDebian Diversity statement acceptedPosted Jun 5, 2012 7:10 UTC (Tue) by josh (subscriber, #17465)Parent article: Debian Diversity statement accepted
I find myself curious what 19 voters found objectionable.
(Log in to post comments)
Debian Diversity statement accepted Posted Jun 5, 2012 8:49 UTC (Tue) by cmm (guest, #81305) [Link]
My guess would be the sheer tedium of it all.
Debian Diversity statement accepted Posted Jun 5, 2012 23:57 UTC (Tue) by randomguy3 (subscriber, #71063) [Link]
Seems unlikely, since the option they voted for was "further discussion", which would just lead to more tedium.
Debian Diversity statement accepted Posted Jun 6, 2012 9:05 UTC (Wed) by cmm (guest, #81305) [Link]
They could always wait out the discussion, then vote against again.
No surrendering to the tedium!
Debian Diversity statement accepted Posted Jun 5, 2012 11:45 UTC (Tue) by mennucc1 (subscriber, #14730) [Link]
> I find myself curious what 19 voters found objectionable.
Maybe by a form of "diversity"? :-)
|
|||||||||||||